The COVID-19 pandemic has forever changed the paradigm of work. While many people lose several hours in commuting between their home and office, always having to live in areas close to it, telecommuting has enabled people to explore the world while working on a laptop computer with internet access.
As attractive as a life free of obligations and with more flexibility in finding a place to live can be, digital nomads bring enormous problems to the local host communities, such as increased pressure on natural resources and services, increased housing prices due to higher wages as a rule, and, as a result, a widening social gap.
In order to make community life fairer, and to avoid abuses in taxation, this proposal was created:
Article 1
Definition of Fiscal Residence
1 - Establish clear criteria for determining the tax residence of digital nomads, considering factors such as length of stay in the country, family ties and permanent residence.
2 - Consider as eligible for tax purposes all those who stay for a period equal to or longer than 32 consecutive days.
Article 2
Taxation Rules for Digital Nomads
1 - All citizens in who are considered digital nomads and who fit the criteria of article 1 may choose for one of two regimes:
a) payment of taxes in the country of residence like national citizens
b) Paying user regime. In this regime the citizen is charged for the public service she uses.
Article 3
Collaboration Between Countries
1 - Promote international cooperation for sharing information on taxation of digital nomads.
Article 4
Awareness and Education
1 - Conducting awareness campaigns aimed at informing digital nomads about their tax obligations in their country of residence and helping them understand tax regulations and processes.
Article 5
Enforcement and Penalties
1 - Strengthen enforcement of digital nomads' tax obligations through audits, states and cooperation with businesses.
2 - Establish penalties at the European level for those who do not comply with their tax obligations.
Why women can’t be decisive about their bodies? If they were raped, should they give birth to the baby? If they know they cannot afford having a child or are not mentally prepared should they give birth to the baby and then not give it a proper life? Countries should focus on a good sexual education, giving information about family planning and giving girls an opportunity to buy birth control, not on banning abortion
Just despicable to dont give options to women. Their bodies, their rights, their decisions. You dont know the background of the person to decide upon what's best.
Avoid the worst examples from US and let women decide! Abortion should be available in every Member State - free of charge and done by medical professionals.
Women should have the right to decide what are their options! This is just despicable! Our bodies, our rights, our decisions. How can someone decide for us?! I say NO to this idea!
The right to abortion is part of women’s rights to her body. As long as no child is born, it is absolutely the right of the woman and her decision whether or not to give birth to a child. I do not believe that a form of authority has a right over the decision in respect of a task, in favour or against the decision of the person concerned. This proposal is inadmissible and does not take into account a large number of fundamental human rights.