We propose a reform to the Council Recommendation on a quality framework for traineeships (2014/C 88/01), so that the jurisdiction is extended to include curricular placements.
Currently, the Recommendation explicitly mentions that it "does not include work experience that is part of formal education or vocational education and training curricula". This creates ambiguity as to the quality that can be expected from curricular placements, even though they are essential in providing work experience prior to entry into the professional world.
The inclusion of work placements in the quality framework is a step forward in the management of the education-work transition and its implications for youth employment. Although the reform of Recommendation 2014/C 88/01 proposed here will not entail binding obligations or rights for Member States, it can serve as a de facto roadmap for Member States to regulate internships at national level, making them more quality-oriented. It would explicitly ensure the improvement of the quality of traineeships, whether curricular or non-curricular, through the principles mentioned in the Recommendation: conclusion of a written traineeship agreement, educational and training objectives, working conditions applicable to trainees (including financial remuneration), rights and obligations, reasonable duration, appropriate recognition of traineeships, transparency requirements, cross-border placements, use of European Structural and Investment Funds, etc.
Furthermore, the incorporation of curricular placements into Recommendation 2014/C 88/01 will give universities and higher education institutions the role of "social partners", taking a more active role in the implementation of the principles of this Recommendation and in the management of curricular placements at European level. It should be noted that youth unemployment rates vary across the European Union; however, one thing that almost all Member States have in common is the compulsory nature of a traineeship during higher education studies. Thus, including such periods in Recommendation 2014/C 88/01 would provide some cohesion between Member States.
What people think
Any thoughts on this idea?